New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - General MFN Discussion

Re: What is up with MFN-67?

By eyeballll
9/30/2016 7:52 pm
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think your "A" is what JDB is suggesting. The problem that I described is that the owner doesn't actually 'leave', he just disappears. In JDB's solution, the AI would take over if the owner became absent.

Re: What is up with MFN-67?

By GrandadB
9/30/2016 11:59 pm
I want to publically apologize here for previous statements, were way out of line, and you wont hear anything like that again from me. I have a problem with picks being valued way, way too low on the trade meter. But, so what? There are going to be those who can take advantage of that better than others, which is gamesmanship. I highly value both the game and players who put a lot of time and involvement into it. So, again, my sincere apologies, I greatly prefer to be a positive influence than a negative one.
Last edited at 10/01/2016 12:00 am

Re: What is up with MFN-67?

By jdavidbakr - Site Admin
10/01/2016 10:52 am
eyeballll wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think your "A" is what JDB is suggesting. The problem that I described is that the owner doesn't actually 'leave', he just disappears. In JDB's solution, the AI would take over if the owner became absent.


This is correct - right now if you have abandoned your team, the AI will try to re-sign the best players during the end of season stage (as long as there is cap room to do it). But if a player is still owned by a human, the AI will leave it alone. My idea above is to make the default be that the AI does not leave it alone unless you tell it to.

Re: What is up with MFN-67?

By eyeballll
10/01/2016 11:24 am
Awesome! If that is what you are suggesting, it would be a great solution to this problem.